For a concise, readable summary of iTulip concepts developed over the past 16 years and a vision of a challenging next decade and how to navigate it, read Eric Janszen's book "Post Catastrophe Economy".
Join the discussion of today's events with a wide range of professionals with an interest in economics and finance.
Register to join our 50,000 plus member registered community from 78 countries today.
Subscribe to iTulip Select for access to the longest running, deep, accurate, and unvarnished macro economic trends analysis and forecasting available, since 1998.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Will all due respect, I don't believe the Fed or bond market participants have the good sense to endorse your M3.
How very diplomatic of thou, and nice return of my "serve". ;)
I honestly can't expect broad recognition and agreement with my reconstruction since I don't have the requisite "stature", regardless of how black and white and logical the process was to rebuild and publish it. Even John Williams isn't well followed and is considered way off the beaten path at best.
At least both he and I have been ridiculed many times, and I can't say I'm looking forward to step two:
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
Supporting the dollar by purchases of new U.S. debt has become the Hot Potato of global central banking. Each time the U.S. Debt Hot Potato is tossed by the current holder, a new holder has to be ready to catch and hold it, at least for a while, or all of the holders of existing U.S. debt will suffer a depreciation of reserves. So it gets tossed from one unhappy holder to the next... from Japan, to China, to oil producers, perhaps back to Japan again, for decades. The latest holder is a political not an economic arrangement. Perhaps alternative arrangements are being made, such as a floating tariff, so that some day no one has to hold to U.S. Debt Hot Potato, or maybe a mis-step or miscommunication occurs in the next hand-off and the Hot Potato gets dropped on the ground.
any predictions, anyone, on when/if the u.s. has to issue debt denominated in something other than u.s. dollars?
The question is what area can the fed inflate and or put in debt next? Not the housing market, not the stock market, not consumer debt.
It leaves cities, counties and states to take on massive debt threw bond sales or P/P for infrastructure expansion (roads,water,sewer,electric,tele,schools.public buildings,ect.). What a easy sale to the public (more debt) as needed infrastructure caused by all the real estate expansion as of late. It creates good jobs for the community ect,ect. The increased property tax income from higher assessed values will allow for new debt to be issued. New cash flow means loads of new debt. If that’s not enough collateral for new debt bring on the private/public partnerships and start handing over infrastructure ownership to the global corps. It’s a play that the private equity companies have been lining up for some time, foreseeable threw their recent acquisitions.
The question is what area can the fed inflate and or put in debt next? Not the housing market, not the stock market, not consumer debt.
It leaves cities, counties and states to take on massive debt threw bond sales or P/P for infrastructure expansion (roads,water,sewer,electric,tele,schools.public buildings,ect.). What a easy sale to the public (more debt) as needed infrastructure caused by all the real estate expansion as of late. It creates good jobs for the community ect,ect. The increased property tax income from higher assessed values will allow for new debt to be issued. New cash flow means loads of new debt.
This looks like New Deal talk to me.
It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye!
The question is what area can the fed inflate and or put in debt next? Not the housing market, not the stock market, not consumer debt.
It leaves cities, counties and states to take on massive debt threw bond sales or P/P for infrastructure expansion (roads,water,sewer,electric,tele,schools.public buildings,ect.). What a easy sale to the public (more debt) as needed infrastructure caused by all the real estate expansion as of late. It creates good jobs for the community ect,ect. The increased property tax income from higher assessed values will allow for new debt to be issued. New cash flow means loads of new debt. If that’s not enough collateral for new debt bring on the private/public partnerships and start handing over infrastructure ownership to the global corps. It’s a play that the private equity companies have been lining up for some time, foreseeable threw their recent acquisitions.
This is precisely what happened in Japan. Once the national government had run debt to the limit permitted by law, the prefectures took over. All that's needed in the case of the US is a change in state fiscal law to allow states to run deficits. Selling assets to China may be politically difficult, but not if the US is in dire enough straights.
infrastructure funds have already been buying toll roads, bridges, etc. macquarie, an australian outfit, has been a leader, but others have gotten into the game.
This is precisely what happened in Japan. Once the national government had run debt to the limit permitted by law, the prefectures took over. All that's needed in the case of the US is a change in state fiscal law to allow states to run deficits. Selling assets to China may be politically difficult, but not if the US is in dire enough straights.
Within these Preliminary Critical Needs, three funds have been established to address unique
transportation-related needs:
��
Leveraging private investments for strategic roadway and rail transit corridors through
Public Private Partnerships (PPP)
page 12
Potential Public Private Partnership (PPP) Opportunities to Support Urban Growth
In compiling this Preliminary Critical Needs Definition document, it became apparent that a
number of potential new high capacity roadway corridors could be excellent candidates for a
PPP, including such projects as the North-South Freeway corridor through Pinal County from
US 60 on the north to I-10 on the south; the Val Vista Expressway/Freeway corridor
through Pinal and Maricopa counties from the future SR 303L extension on the west to the
future North-South Freeway corridor on the east; SR 303L south of SR 801 to I-8 in
Maricopa County; the Hassayampa Freeway corridor from US 93 to the future SR 303L
extension in Maricopa County; and the New River Freeway from SR 303L to I-17, as well as
the proposed intercity rail within the Sun Megapolitan Corridor and commuter rail in the
Phoenix and Tucson Metropolitan Areas. Each of these corridors:
��
Has logical termini at other existing or future high capacity corridors.
��
Serves the anticipated rapid urban growth within the Sun Corridor Megapolitan.
��
Traverses large future master planned communities or mixed use developments that
view such transportation investments as major assets and may be willing to dedicate
right-of-way.
��
Has parallel routes for users not willing to pay for the use of such a privatized
corridor.
As a result, in anticipation of the potential to implement a statewide sustainable
transportation finance mechanism, it may be appropriate to consider establishing an
inducement fund to stimulate development of such corridors. Currently, three
development/property owner groups have emerged along these corridors to explore the
opportunity of advancing corridor development through PPPs. In addition, ADOT, FHWA,
MAG and Pinal County have begun discussions on initiating corridor studies in conjunction
with an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process, in order to establish corridor
locations as early as possible, potentially enabling right-of-way dedications from adjacent
Supporting the dollar by purchases of new U.S. debt has become the Hot Potato of global central banking. Each time the U.S. Debt Hot Potato is tossed by the current holder, a new holder has to be ready to catch and hold it, at least for a while, or all of the holders of existing U.S. debt will suffer a depreciation of reserves. So it gets tossed from one unhappy holder to the next... from Japan, to China, to oil producers, perhaps back to Japan again, for decades. The latest holder is a political not an economic arrangement. Perhaps alternative arrangements are being made, such as a floating tariff, so that some day no one has to hold to U.S. Debt Hot Potato, or maybe a mis-step or miscommunication occurs in the next hand-off and the Hot Potato gets dropped on the ground.
This is being implemented by U.S. based banks throughout the world... ¿Probe? We at work just were being offered a bond with a percentage composed of USD debt from the Banamex (Citibank) local branch... If I'm supporting others debt, I'd prefer it to be in local currency and that the debt supported has some foundations. I wouldn't like to have an asset that is deflating due to exchange rate variations, as was the case when moved out of the Euro in last august.
Ms. Watanabe, Ms. Cheng and Ms. Hung are not alone in supporting US debt, ithey are beginning to be joined by Ms. Gonzalez and Ms. Guimaraes ...
Comment