Just a general question to iTulip members at large:
I was hearing Jim Rogers recently comment that at the present moment he considers silver to be a better buy than gold because silver is 70% off it's all-time highs.
Fair enough. But I think the all-time highs were also in an era where there was a strong industrial demand for silver in the photographic business arena- a demand which must have declined enormously in the digital photography era.
I believe there was also a little something about a couple guys cornering the market for silver at some point.....
Then there is also the mining issue, which I know nothing about, but figure silver is either cheaper to get out of the ground now, or more expensive- and should that be taken into consideration too?
Silver value must reflect some mix of industrial/monetary hedge/jewelry demand, but given the decline of film photography do we still expect demand to raise silver prices to heights we have seen before? Or is silver really different these days than in the last big runup?
I was hearing Jim Rogers recently comment that at the present moment he considers silver to be a better buy than gold because silver is 70% off it's all-time highs.
Fair enough. But I think the all-time highs were also in an era where there was a strong industrial demand for silver in the photographic business arena- a demand which must have declined enormously in the digital photography era.
I believe there was also a little something about a couple guys cornering the market for silver at some point.....
Then there is also the mining issue, which I know nothing about, but figure silver is either cheaper to get out of the ground now, or more expensive- and should that be taken into consideration too?
Silver value must reflect some mix of industrial/monetary hedge/jewelry demand, but given the decline of film photography do we still expect demand to raise silver prices to heights we have seen before? Or is silver really different these days than in the last big runup?
Comment