Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Leverage on Leverage...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Leverage on Leverage...

    http://www.myprops.org/content/Absol...rs-it-imposes/

    The problem is the leverage. It starts with the home/property buyer or speculator(house flipper). He buys a $300,000 property with little to no money down. A mortgage is generated through a lender who gets funding from an outside source. That document is now an interest bearing note. Who buys that note? Someone who borrowed money at 4% or less and buys that note yielding 6% as part of a tranche of morgtages. The differential in the interest creates yet another derivative or opportunity to leverage.

    So now we have unkown amounts of leverage applied to a house that cost 300k. 10:1 leverage, maybe more is used to enhance the spread of 1-2 points. So what happens when that house declines to $250k in value? What risk is there to the face value of the note? Roughly 16%+ under water, right? Now multiply 10x. Minus 160%, right? Hummm, that's a problem. You lost your principal and some of the leverage. That CDO you bought with 10x leverage is not only worthless, it's less than worthless. But don't worry, the loans are still paying interest, so everything is still cool.

    Now what happens when a portion or all of the mortgages in that CDO go into default? Now there is little to no yield and the assets are in decline. It becomes a chain reaction. The homeowner stops paying, the mortgage company stops getting payments, they can't pay the CDO holder. So now you have dead paper that if leveraged, is definitely worthless and you have lost part of the leverage also. You are not only insolvent, you owe money.

    The home buyer has it easy. He walked away from the property when he went under water and stopped his monthly bleeding. He just stuck the bank for the loan and the bank now has to pick up the taxes and insurance to protect their position. That costs money. If the buck stopped there, the bank could liquidate the house for 200k and take the 100k hit, no problem, it ends there.

    But it doesn't stop there. Some investment banker leveraged the interest differential and then sold it to a hedge fund that uses borrowed Yen to buy those notes to leverage them even more. He just added another level of risk, the $/Yen risk. If the Yen appreciates 4-5%, he is all done. It's a house of cards and the parties in the chain are all at risk for far more than their principal.

    I don't think the average person could even begin to understand how bad this really is. We know that 15% of subprime is in default, roughly 300 billion, 10x leverage means that on average there are 3 trillion in potential losses. There are 2 trillion in subprime loans. That means 1 trillion is owed to those who supplied the leverage. Yes, they can recover some of the losses from the sale of the property.

    If 50% of subprime goes to default, losses will be 10 trillion. That's just subprime, how about prime debt

  • #2
    Re: Leverage on Leverage...

    Tonight on CNN they talked to a guy in Florida that took out a HELOC, obviously he's now underwater by 50% or whatever. And he took out a loan on his 401k, but has since been layed off.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Leverage on Leverage...

      I think this could be linked to Mike Whitney's latest article - Trouble at Treasury

      Apart from the infrequent fulminations of congressmen clowning for the cameras, the hearings were tedious and unproductive. The bankers remained stonefaced throughout, while the committee turned in their typical sub par performance. Congress doesn't do oversight anymore, and even if it did, there's no one with the fortitude to apply the rules. Besides, no one in the House has the foggiest idea of how the financial system really works. If they did, they'd know that the banks HAVE actually been lending despite congress's spurious accusations. Some of the banks even produced documented evidence to prove it. This has been a flashpoint for taxpayers who think that they were duped by financial institutions that took the $165 billion TARP money and used it for bonuses or to buy smaller banks. Not so. The truth is more complicated.

      The banks have been hoarding; that much is certain. In fact, The St Louis Fed's charts show that:

      "Until September, excess reserves hovered at or below about US $2 billion, but have ballooned to over $600 billion as of November 19, 2008....The Fed has thrown money at the banking system, but the banks are hoarding the cash, they do not lend." (Axel Merk, "Monetizing the Debt")

      Excess reserves are reserves that are beyond the required capital limits. The steady buildup--which now exceeds $700 billion--suggests that the banks are hunkering down for long and deep recession. They are in survival mode. Still, that does not mean they are not lending. In fact, "Bank Credit expanded $459bn year-over-year, or 4.9 per cent. Bank Credit jumped $356bn over the past 21 weeks." (Doug Noland Credit Bubble Bulletin) It's true; bank lending has actually increased even though standards have gotten tougher and consumers are saving for the first time in decades.

      How can the banks be lending and hoarding at the same time; aren't the two mutually exclusive? And why is credit draining from the system in trillions of dollars if the banks continue to lend?

      This is big mystery of the financial crisis, but one that can be solved by reviewing the facts. J P MorganChase's Jamie Dimon explained it like this:

      "There's a huge amount of non bank lending which has disappeared which is the same thing to the consumer (as the banks)...Finance companies, car finance companies, money funds, bond funds..that withdrew money from the system (when the credit crunch took hold) making it much harder on the system. That created the crisis we now have."

      The Wall Street Journal summed it up even more succinctly:

      "Chairman Barney Frank's hearing was intended to flay the CEOs for not lending enough. It fell flat as political theater because banks have actually increased their lending in recent months. The people who aren't lending more are investors in nonbank financing such as asset-backed securities.

      In fact, the nonbank credit market is normally much bigger than bank lending. But new issues backed by auto loans, credit cards and the like have been rare this year, as markets wonder how the government's next move will change the value of such investments. Buyers and sellers of existing securities are "sitting on the sidelines,"
      according to Asset-Backed Alert, waiting for still another Washington recalibration of risk and reward." ("Committee on Doubt and Uncertainty" Wall Street Journal)

      This is how the financial system really works--something which seems to be completely beyond the grasp of congress. A shadow banking system has grown up around the process of securitization, which packages pools of debt (mortgages, commercial real estate, student loans, car loans and credit card debt) and sells them as securities to foreign banks, hedge funds, insurance companies etc. Wall Street has muscled into an area of finance that used to be the domain of the commercial banks.
      And unregulated to boot! Lending at far higher risk -- and pretending that they have insured the risk away!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Leverage on Leverage...

        Also a great take by Elaine Supkis - TOP GOLDMAN SACHS EXECUTIVES DROWNING LIKE RATS

        It is with a ton of Schadenfreude that we saw on TV today, Goldman Sach’s genius investors striking a major iceberg. Namely, the top partners used GS stock values as collateral for borrowing Japanese carry trade loans to play the markets! This is exactly what was forbidden, post 1929 Great Crash! What is driving all stocks relentlessly down are these ‘margin calls’ and some of these are for men who made many multiples of millions. Human greed falls for every possible folly.



        Goldman Partners Borrow to Cover Margin Calls - Financials * US * News * Story - CNBC.com
        Several Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.
        But Goldman stock [GS 84.60 -1.11 (-1.3%) ] has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can’t meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don’t have enough cash on hand.

        Ah, all the debates I had with these sorts of guys in the past! ’You will get richer if you borrow against your assets and then use it in the stock markets’, they loved to say. And I always said, ‘Don’t forget the 1920’s, this is how it all fell apart!’

        .
        .
        .
        .

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Leverage on Leverage...

          Originally posted by Rajiv View Post
          I think this could be linked to Mike Whitney's latest article - Trouble at Treasury



          And unregulated to boot! Lending at far higher risk -- and pretending that they have insured the risk away!
          The Washington Times published a great article on this subject last week. I sent it around to family and friends in an attempt to combat the nonsense coming out of Congress. My father (works 60 hours, no time to study these things) said, "thanks, I've never even heard of securitization markets before."

          The administration and the Congress, both parties, are deliberately keeping people in the dark and it makes me f'n sick.
          Last edited by Slimprofits; February 19, 2009, 06:28 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Leverage on Leverage...

            Sometimes I still need to study the pictures:



            http://www.publicradio.org/columns/m...ainer_unc.html

            http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_...=&fullscreen=1" />http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_...=&fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="302">
            Crisis" target="_blank">http://vimeo.com/1876936">Crisis explainer: Uncorking CDOs from Marketplacehttp://vimeo.com/marketplace">Marketplace> on Vimeohttp://vimeo.com">Vimeo>.

            Comment

            Working...
            X