The Game is Rigged, Are you betting with the House or Against it?

[Sapiens]

Gentlemen,

The CONgress just bought us another 5 years with their “stimulus package”, in my opinion.

Now, I will start to seek new opportunities where to make good profits and capital, I am willing to share my research if EJ or FRED creates a private forum for mutual sharing and dissemination of business intelligence.

For those that are willing to participate and you have something to offer, please voice you opinion in the affirmative.

Cheers,

-Sapiens

[Rajiv]

Re: The Game is Rigged, Are you betting with the House or Against it?

Sapiens,

I am in. Let us see what we can come up with.

[Andreuccio]

Re: The Game is Rigged, Are you betting with the House or Against it?

Sapiens,

I am in. Let us see what we can come up with.

Sapiens,

Much as I'd like to be in, I fear I have nothing to offer beyond bon repartee and the occasional clarifying question. (And my good looks, but that's not much use on the internet, is it?)

Do you think if I slip the doorman a Jackson he'll let me slide? ;)

[c1ue]

Re: The Game is Rigged, Are you betting with the House or Against it?

Sapiens,

Is the objective internal US investment, external, or anything which makes forward purchasing power movement?

If the latter, I'll throw my hat into the ring.

[dbarberic]

Re: The Game is Rigged, Are you betting with the House or Against it?

I don't understand how you have come to the conculsion that the one time stimulus package will get us five more years. A few months maybe, but five years?!?

[FRED]

Re: The Game is Rigged, Are you betting with the House or Against it?

Gentlemen,

The CONgress just bought us another 5 years with their “stimulus package”, in my opinion.

Now, I will start to seek new opportunities where to make good profits and capital, I am willing to share my research if EJ or FRED creates a private forum for mutual sharing and dissemination of business intelligence.

For those that are willing to participate and you have something to offer, please voice you opinion in the affirmative.

Cheers,

-Sapiens

We've been thinking about starting an Insider's Rumor thread and a Business Intelligence thread in the iTulip Select area. The rules are that rumors have to be well qualified (multiple sources) and the business intelligence the result of diligent research. Is this in line with what you have in mind?

[Sapiens]

Re: The Game is Rigged, Are you betting with the House or Against it?

the business intelligence the result of diligent research. Is this in line with what you have in mind?

FRED,

I am not interested in the rumor venue, since in my opinion, it leads to wasteful diversion of valuable resources and attention.

I am interested in sharing diligent research on which we can compare notes, voice different perspectives and enjoy and benefit from its resultant insights. Sometimes you will notice that we will “see,” understand or comprehend the intentions of policy makers or “insiders” which will lead to profitable opportunities. In addition, the proposition to make it private is to limit access to those individuals whom have shown to have quality discernment.

If the above is agreeable, I welcome the opportunity for us to collaborate.

-Sapiens