For a concise, readable summary of iTulip concepts developed over the past 16 years and a vision of a challenging next decade and how to navigate it, read Eric Janszen's book "Post Catastrophe Economy".
Join the discussion of today's events with a wide range of professionals with an interest in economics and finance.
Register to join our 50,000 plus member registered community from 78 countries today.
Subscribe to iTulip Select for access to the longest running, deep, accurate, and unvarnished macro economic trends analysis and forecasting available, since 1998.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Perhaps my reading comprehension needs a bit of work but I thought that you guys had said that the switch was from Early Adopters to Early Majority in the previous article. Is this a change in view (as to where we are on the curve) or is it a typo?
Whew, I'm glad that it was a typo. Still some time to buy fellas (and ladies)!
Watch that clip and replace Nigel Tufnel with Greenspan and you can't help but laugh all over again (because it's a great movie to begin with). The whole thing applies.
The dollar will go down because the Fed can play one louder than everyone else. "If we need that extra push over the cliff..."
Alas, that applies to many of us who found itulip late. ;)
I bought some gold at $860 as insurance but don't expect a big return on it. Showing up late has been a pattern for me; I started putting money in an IRA when I got my first job in 2001, bought a house in 2008, etc.
Cumulatively, I'm down about $4k in total on investments since starting. Down closer to 34k if you count home equity. Throw in inflation and sometimes I wonder why I bother trying.
I read a lot of financial advice that doesn't seem to talk about the effects of investment and the economy on people. The human element, if you'll pardon the cliché. Most of the economic commentary that the mainstream media pushes and advertises, is written as if life -- and money -- had no other purpose than to boost your spreadsheet numbers higher and higher, and it doesn't matter how. I know that better analysis is out there, but I just don't usually see it in the mainstream media.
Most of the financial advice that I read is typically wrong in their predictions (at least, during a useful time-frame). iTulip is typically right. I really don't think that's co-incidence. Something about seeing forests and trees, I think.
Gold as a store of value has been getting a bad rap from some quarters at least since the days of economist John Maynard Keynes, who once sneeringly called it a “barbarous relic.”
One would think that a supposedly professional journalist like Larry and a supposedly accurate publication like the WSJ could at least get their quotes and facts correct. It was the gold standard that Keynes called a barbarous relic.
What Keynes actually said was:
"In truth, the gold standard is already a barbarous relic. All of us, from the Governor of the Bank of England downwards, are now primarily interested in preserving the stability of business, prices, and employment, and are not likely, when the choice is forced on us, deliberately to sacrifice these to outworn dogma, which had its value once, of 3 pounds, 17 shillings, 10 1/2 pence per ounce. Advocates of the ancient standard do not observe how remote it now is from the spirit and the requirements of the age. A regulated nonmetallic standard has slipped in unnoticed. It exists."
-- John Maynard Keynes, 1932, in "A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard, 1821-1931"
One would think that a supposedly professional journalist like Larry and a supposedly accurate publication like the WSJ could at least get their quotes and facts correct. It was the gold standard that Keynes called a barbarous relic.
Yeah - I always laugh when everybody gets that one wrong.
Suddenly I am not comforted by the fact that I own way more gold than a NY Bank VP who is almost 20 years older than me. :eek:
“The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.” - John Maynard Keynes.
I was late on the PM bandwagon. Luckily, I invested heavily in firearm ammunition when it was dirt cheap (by today's standards) and profited handsomely.
"ETFs generally, and gold ETFs especially, almost never work as advertised. We avoid them. And we have never once purchased a gold mining stock."
perhaps you should make this more evident to novice investors before making blanket statements such as "time to short commercial real estate" and thereby saving said novice investor the pain of his/her investment in SRS drop by circa 70% from the point of your advice. I know, I know, some always have the photographic memory to drudge up an old quote from Eric saying he warned you about such and such, but given the relative unwieldy maneuvering around your website the lay reader (yours truly) will not have the benefit of the totality of your advice. in addition, you say you don't like ETFs or mining companies, but don't leave it up to the commenters to give specific investment vehicles which might be a better alternative.
I can relate to that in my flying experience JK. When taking off in a Lear Jet you go to 110% of power to get to a safe flight level rapidly. Yes, you are pushing the engines past design for a short period of time but it's safer.
I don't know why you need 11 on sound though?:rolleyes: Maybe before the wife comes home???? :eek:
"ETFs generally, and gold ETFs especially, almost never work as advertised. We avoid them. And we have never once purchased a gold mining stock."
perhaps you should make this more evident to novice investors before making blanket statements such as "time to short commercial real estate" and thereby saving said novice investor the pain of his/her investment in SRS drop by circa 70% from the point of your advice.
June 16, 2008 Forecast: Top in CRE, will fall from $15B to $8B by June 2010
Chart created and published June 2008
May 19, 2009 Actual: Got the timing of the top in CRE correct to the exact month, but the decline to $8B we forecast occurred more than twice as quickly than expected.
Chart created and published May 2009
We did not discuss any negative ETFs such as SRS in the article as these are not relevant to commercial real estate. At the time we suggested as "examples" the following:
1) Short a builder with exposure in retail in Florida, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Denver, and For Worth
DDR traded then at $39, bottomed at $1.19, and now trades at $4.48.
FRT traded then at $73, bottomed at $38, and now trades at $54.
Even if one closed out short positions today, one still made money.
Even if SRS were relevant to CRE, we have never bought and held a short ETF for more than a few months nor have we ever said it was a good idea to do so.
We have repeatedly stated short ETFs cannot be held for more than a brief period.
Additionally, we have observed over the years that even over brief periods short ETFs frequently do not behave as expected.
Perhaps we need to repeat these points more often.
Comment