Martin Armstrong's latest

[skidder]

Here is Martin Armstrong's latest article titled "Will gold reach $5,000?" An interesting read.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19199220/W...Reach-5000-809

[Charles Mackay]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

"gold represents loss of confidence in government... has nothing to do with inflation or deflation"

That's a big 10 -4 !!!

[ThePythonicCow]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

Another quote from this one that I like:

The whole thing about fiat currency is largely misunderstood. Paper currency is by itself not a threat to the economy when it is considered in its true nature, a form of floating share in the nation issuing it.

When there is no Rule of Law, then it matters not how much gold a nation has its natural resources, for they are of no value if contracts are not honored.

[Charles Mackay]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

Another quote from this one that I like:

Exactly! In addition to granting immunity to the Telecoms for spying on all of our email correspondence, Obama has now granted immunity to Baxter and Novartis for the untested Swine Flu vaccine. Was it in this Armstrong article that he quoted Jefferson as having said that the judicial branch was more dangerous than other three branches? They will not stop this illegal activity by the executive branch.

[audrey_girl]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

you may also want to take a look at this, if you haven't already:

http://matterhornassetmanagement.com...?newsletter=21

[Mega]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

I think the Battle ground is Gold + $1,000..................."They" will fight that like hell because once it beats $1000 its off!
Mike

[dummass]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

Armstrong is an interesting read. Like other thinking men, his writings tend to lack organization, which requires the reader to connect the dots and fill in the blanks at times. This paper, in particular, was short of any real conclusions or recomendations. In general, however, he parallels iTulip's forcasts.

[dummass]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

I think the Battle ground is Gold + $1,000..................."They" will fight that like hell because once it beats $1000 its off!
Mike

That's not what he said: "The first real resistance is formed by the primary channel that shows $1,350 - $1,750 between 2010 and 2012." ´He goes on to say, that after "breaking this overhead resistance... $3,500 to $5,000" becomes the new "target zone."

[Jay]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

I love his stuff. It is so wacky and yet so good. He loses me at times, but always has lots of great nuggets.

[Charles Mackay]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

Armstrong is an interesting read. Like other thinking men, his writings tend to lack organization, which requires the reader to connect the dots and fill in the blanks at times. This paper, in particular, was short of any real conclusions or recomendations. In general, however, he parallels iTulip's forcasts.

He's writing from a jail cell on a manual typewriter!

[LargoWinch]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

He's writing from a jail cell on a manual typewriter!

Oh [insert light bulb]. Now I recognize the style!

This gentleman - which I know nothing about - is also forecasting Dow 30,000 by 2015:

Will-the-Dow-Reach-30000-by-2015

[metalman]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

it reads like ej in 20 yrs after he's lost his mind. maybe ej should retire before he goes Martin Armstrong.

[thunderdownunder]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

My Head Hurts !!
But I just can't for the life of me, discount this strange fellow - Either he is so advanced in his theory that the World has to catch up or.............
He is grasping at co-incidental ghosts that appear real to him as he computes cycles and discovers that they have a life cycle of their own.

He has such a vast knowledge of history and timelines. He is confusing and disjointed BUT try as I might over the last two months(Thanks a lot Bovinator) I cannot find a fault with either his theory, his graphs, figures or historical data. Do any of you realize I had to go to the State and federal Library and go through microfilm of past papers and stock quotes. Then through history books and old records back to Roman times ( the Internet does not know all, Still). Guess what -This fellow is neither a Fool or crazy. He has hard evidence to back his claims - claims that are not "to the day" in accuracy but empirical non the less (please look that up).
I "crunch" numbers as well as anyone( essentially how I eat) this fellow makes the theory of Mathematics, wave theory and chaos theory come together in a way that opens the mind (till it hurts) - He is beyond my feeble attempts to prove him wrong. Crazy people or fools have no base arguments that holds water - this fellow just defies known logic
The system keeps him Locked up and for good reason - OK FOIL HATS ON LADS - what does Sonia Sotomayor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_A._Armstrong have to do with the price of chicken in China on Sunday? Answer - She lock him up a long time for Contempt of Court - Say What? Mother and child murderers, Rapists, Drug lords, pedophiles and Banksters get off easier. Is she a person of interest in the scheme of things ? I repeat "Contempt of Court"- what is that worth Really - 1 year maybe two - things are sometimes beyond reason unless there is a reason?
Don't discount Brilliance until you can prove otherwise.

[Serge_Tomiko]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

The system keeps him Locked up and for good reason - OK FOIL HATS ON LADS - what does Sonia Sotomayor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_A._Armstrong have to do with the price of chicken in China on Sunday? Answer - She lock him up a long time for Contempt of Court - Say What? Mother and child murderers, Rapists, Drug lords, pedophiles and Banksters get off easier. Is she a person of interest in the scheme of things ? I repeat "Contempt of Court"- what is that worth Really - 1 year maybe two - things are sometimes beyond reason unless there is a reason?
Don't discount Brilliance until you can prove otherwise.

It is rare I believe there is an organized conspiracy, but in this instance it is the only explanation. Here in New York City, what you say is true - many convicted of heinous crimes serve less time than this man did for simple contempt of court.

Being held for 7 years without a trial is a heinous disregard of our justice system. The simple fact Sotomeyer was involved and is now a supreme court justice indicates to me there is more going on here than we know.

[dummass]

Re: Martin Armstrong's latest

it reads like ej in 20 yrs after he's lost his mind. maybe ej should retire before he goes Martin Armstrong.

We test his theory then. At the end of the 30,000 DOW article, posted by Largo, he lays out his prediction in a rather precise manner: If we do not get a monthly close above 11,000--we will retest the March lows by June 2010. :p