Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

    Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in fake U.S. bonds

    What happened: In News of the Weird: June 10, 2009 we were the first U.S. website to cover the case of the $134.5 billion in fake U.S. government bonds after one of our readers located the story on a German site. We posted the first video about it the same day, June 10. Other sites picked it up the next day and put various conspiracy spins to it. Since then the story has been picked up by hundreds of sites around the world.

    One of our members read our report here and asked, Wait a minute. Can this many physical bearer bonds even exist?

    Another member quickly turned up evidence that revealed the paper securities cannot be real.
    Fraudulent T-Bills / Bonds / CD & GIC Investments

    The Forms in which Marketable Treasury Securities Exist

    Marketable U.S. Treasury securities only exist in three forms: (1) book-entry, (2) bearer, and (3) registered. An overwhelming amount (99.84% of outstanding marketable securities) are in book-entry form which exist not as printed certificates but rather as computer records.

    Only .14% exist in bearer form of printed certificate with interest coupons attached but no name on it. Finally, an even smaller percentage (.02% of outstanding marketable securities) exist in registered form with the name of the owner on it. They discontinued the issuance of printed registered securities in 1986.

    Using that data and Treasury Department data that $3.3 trillion in bonds are held outside the U.S. it was trivial to calculate that $143.5 billion in physical U.S. Treasury bearer bonds cannot exist:
    0.14% x $3.3 trillion total foreign holdings = $4.6 billion.
    Since the bonds cannot be real and thus must be fake, and a long history of fake U.S. government securities scams is well documented, our theory on the act of “smuggling” was:
    It's a scam

    Here's our best guess at the scam.

    Step 1: Take a large short position in US Treasury bonds.

    Step 2: Get your Japanese friends to "smuggle" forged Treasury bonds into a country where you are likely to get "caught."

    Step 3: When the rumors fly and the bonds tank, close out your shorts.

    Beats working.

    Yet conspiracy theories based on the possibility that the bonds were real took off over the following week while obvious explanations based on the fact that they cannot be real got buried.

    The day after we broke the story in the U.S., on June 11 Karl Denninger reported:
    Notice, by the way, that the US Media has totally ignored this story - even though the securities in question are allegedly US instruments.

    Gee, I wonder why? Might the authorities know they're real and be just a wee bit nervous that disclosure of a sovereign attempting to covertly dump nearly $140 billion in debt could cause a wee bit of panic, given that we're running nearly $200 billion a month in deficits?
    Or maybe the US Media, rather than speculating, were working on getting the facts?

    On the 13th Denninger updated his report:
    Let's apply a little "Occam's Razor" to this entire story.

    Are we willing to assume that all the "issue" of Treasury bonds has been done "above board" as required by law. If Treasury has been surreptitiously issuing bonds to, say, Japan, as a means of financing deficits that someone didn't want reported over the last, oh, say 10 or 20 years, then the following is about to occur:

    Who could have possibly been complicit in such a scheme? I can come up with only two nations (and only nations could be involved due to size): The Japanese and Chinese. Since the two individuals who were arrested were reported to be Japanese nationals......
    And so on, spinning a number of theories without any new information to base them on and ignoring the obvious problem that $134.5 billion in physical U.S. securities cannot exist. To further incite his audience, he threw in anti-Japanese rhetoric, with references to Pearl Harbor, for good measure.

    Which theory did Slate.com go with? Andrew Leonard reports:
    Karl Denninger, who has been opining on matters online since before the Web was a mere mote in Tim Berners-Lee's eye, wonders at The Market Ticker whether the U.S. Treasury has "has been surreptitiously issuing bonds to, say, Japan, as a means of financing deficits that someone didn't want reported over the last, oh, say 10 or 20 years."

    I remain puzzled, and am not advancing the above theory as fact.

    It is, however, one of the few explanations that actually fits the facts, and for that reason, I think we need some answers. If in fact previous administrations were issuing "off-book" Treasury debt in this fashion to sovereigns then implications are truly explosive as such issues are blatant and outrageous unlawful acts and would expose everyone involved to severe criminal penalties.
    Even the usually journalistic Bloomberg entertained the conspiracy theories as recently as yesterday.

    As it turns out, today the bonds were confirmed to be fake. Jeff Bater at Dow Jones today reported:
    WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--A cache of what appeared to be around $135 billion of U.S. bonds seized at the Italian-Swiss border is, in fact, worthless, a Treasury Department spokesman said.

    Two alleged Japanese citizens were stopped by Italian authorities June 4 trying to cross into Switzerland with the supposed bonds, hidden in the false bottom of a suitcase, the authorities said.

    Authorities said they found 249 certificates worth $500 million each and 10 bonds worth more than $1 billion each, as well as other alleged original banking statements.

    Stephen Meyerhardt, a spokesman for Treasury's Bureau of Public Debt, said Thursday the paper is phony.

    "Based on the photos we've seen on the Web, they're not even close to looking like a Treasury security," he said.

    In the 1980s, the U.S. began converting its marketable debt from paper; these days, Treasury securities are issued electronically.
    No doubt Bater's report will fuel speculation by the conspiracy theorists that the DOW Jones company is in on a grand conspiracy with the Japanese and Treasury Bureau to hide secret sales of U.S. Treasury bonds. Karl Denniger may try to discredit Bater's report.

    What it means: The U.S. has entered a new dark age of unreason. Public trust in private and public institutions that once clearly differentiated the U.S. from third world countries has been eroded in the wake of the financial and economic crisis. At the same time, blogs and mainstream media are left to fight over shrinking ad and subscription revenue as the post FIRE Economy Depression deepens.

    The media that failed to warn the public about the coming collapse is also no longer trusted. Claiming after the fact that no one knew, dspite repeated warnings from independent sources including this one, the media appear to the public to be as captured by FIRE Economy interests as the financial regulators that were supposed to be overseeing the banks and financial institutions. The media are seen by the public as part of the problem.

    At a time when government leadership behaves unethically and even at times illegally, media consumers seek out news sources that do not filter news in ways that support the interests of advertisers. Theories, unsupported by fact and presented with strong emotional content flourish.

    In this toxic environment of distrust and a shrinking economic pie, to win the battle for readership blogs and mainstream media alike appeal to the public's passions and superstitions, always an easier sell than sober reflection and analysis.

    We are entering a troubled period when our world may soon be ruled by demagogues, voted in by an angry, distrustful, and confused public.

    The demagogues are talking, the people are listening. Look no further than the case of the fake U.S. government bonds for evidence of this new and dangerous dynamic.

    Kudos to Jeff Bater for waiting on the story until he got the facts.

    iTulip Select: The Investment Thesis for the Next Cycle™
    __________________________________________________


    To receive the iTulip Newsletter or iTulip Alerts, Join our FREE Email Mailing List

    Copyright © iTulip, Inc. 1998 - 2007 All Rights Reserved

    All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Nothing appearing on this website should be considered a recommendation to buy or to sell any security or related financial instrument. iTulip, Inc. is not liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. Full Disclaimer
    Last edited by FRED; June 19, 2009, 08:49 AM.

  • #2
    Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds

    An excellent point, EJ, but this is a story way too charged to be ignored. Okay, they're phony but produced for what? The denominations are so large. What could they be targeted for? Speculation on that would be of interest. Or is the FIRE world so awash in these shenanigans that that is the point. :eek:

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

      This is one of many reasons why I enjoy coming here. As has been pointed out many times on Itulip, the blurbs we see from the MSM are mostly garbage full of false inductive explanations for a day's events. No one will agree with all of the arguments laid out here, but there is always a consistent reasoning behind them. My brother asked my what I read for my investment ideas and what shapes my processes. I told him to trust himself first and to read Itulip.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

        Of all the posts that Eric has ever posted, this is the only one that doesn't work well me. The leap from somebody reporting "Based on the photos we've seen on the Web, they're not even close to looking like a Treasury security," to "The U.S. has entered a new dark age of unreason" is too big for me to follow. There have always been conspiracy theorists and there always will be. It's even possible that we might see an upsurge in the uptake.

        But the safety and trustworthiness of the USA is largely evaluated on a comparative basis to other countries... not against a hypothetical standard of perfection. I believe that despite our financial services collapse, on a comparative basis we will continue to be seen as more transparent and more open than other countries. The flight to the dollar in Q408 and Q109 is evidence of that.

        There are countries that do better than us. But most are worse. And don't get me wrong... I'm very unhappy with the secrecy and crimes of the Bush administration and the Banksters. But again, on a comparative basis, we're better than China, Japan, Brazil, Russia, much of Europe... etc etc.

        I just don't see the leap to "A Dark Age of Unreason."

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

          Originally posted by EJ View Post
          What it means: The U.S. has entered a new dark age of unreason. Public trust in private and public institutions that once clearly differentiated the U.S. from third world countries has been eroded in the wake of the financial and economic crisis. At the same time, blogs and mainstream media are left to fight over shrinking ad and subscription revenue as the post FIRE Economy Depression deepens.

          The media that failed to warn the public about the coming collapse is also no longer trusted. Claiming after the fact that no one knew, dspite repeated warnings from independent sources including this one, the media appear to the public to be as captured by FIRE Economy interests as the financial regulators that were supposed to be overseeing the banks and financial institutions. The media are seen by the public as part of the problem.

          At a time when government leadership behaves unethically and even at times illegally, media consumers seek out news sources that do not filter news in ways that support the interests of advertisers. Theories, unsupported by fact and presented with strong emotional content flourish.

          In this toxic environment of distrust and a shrinking economic pie, to win the battle for readership blogs and mainstream media alike appeal to the public's passions and superstitions, always an easier sell than sober reflection and analysis.

          We are entering a troubled period when our world may soon be ruled by demagogues, voted in by an angry, distrustful, and confused public.

          The demagogues are talking, the people are listening. Look no further than the case of the fake U.S. government bonds for evidence of this new and dangerous dynamic.

          Kudos to Jeff Bater for waiting on the story until he got the facts.

          iTulip Select: The Investment Thesis for the Next Cycle™
          __________________________________________________


          To receive the iTulip Newsletter or iTulip Alerts, Join our FREE Email Mailing List

          Copyright © iTulip, Inc. 1998 - 2007 All Rights Reserved

          All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Nothing appearing on this website should be considered a recommendation to buy or to sell any security or related financial instrument. iTulip, Inc. is not liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. Full Disclaimer
          All one has to do to realize this is to visit a 9-11 Truther website or engage in debate with a Truther (or a "Chemtrails" conspiracist). A public television station aired a Truther documentary this month. They raised a lot of money from the pinheads who believe that stuff.
          Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

            Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
            All one has to do to realize this is to visit a 9-11 Truther website or engage in debate with a Truther (or a "Chemtrails" conspiracist). A public television station aired a Truther documentary this month. They raised a lot of money from the pinheads who believe that stuff.
            I don't believe in them(chemtrails), but when the WSJ advocates them, I scratch my head

            It’s Time to Cool the Planet

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

              Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
              All one has to do to realize this is to visit a 9-11 Truther website or engage in debate with a Truther (or a "Chemtrails" conspiracist). A public television station aired a Truther documentary this month. They raised a lot of money from the pinheads who believe that stuff.
              tried listening to npr lately?

              the producers of these shows don't give a shit about accuracy anymore.

              'get me a loudmouth nutjob that people tune into! get me viewers. f&ck the brand!'

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                Originally posted by MarkL View Post
                Of all the posts that Eric has ever posted, this is the only one that doesn't work well me. The leap from somebody reporting "Based on the photos we've seen on the Web, they're not even close to looking like a Treasury security," to "The U.S. has entered a new dark age of unreason" is too big for me to follow. There have always been conspiracy theorists and there always will be. It's even possible that we might see an upsurge in the uptake.

                But the safety and trustworthiness of the USA is largely evaluated on a comparative basis to other countries... not against a hypothetical standard of perfection. I believe that despite our financial services collapse, on a comparative basis we will continue to be seen as more transparent and more open than other countries. The flight to the dollar in Q408 and Q109 is evidence of that.

                There are countries that do better than us. But most are worse. And don't get me wrong... I'm very unhappy with the secrecy and crimes of the Bush administration and the Banksters. But again, on a comparative basis, we're better than China, Japan, Brazil, Russia, much of Europe... etc etc.

                I just don't see the leap to "A Dark Age of Unreason."
                i don't see him saying that isn't true, but it's less true. ej posted this checklist yesterday...

                Our checklist is for Treasury bond ownership since 2000 used to be all check marks and is now mostly question marks and a big X:
                • Is the U.S. the most politically stable major country (Yes, but others are, collectively, catching up, while wealth, debt, and income disparities set the US up for future internal conflicts as the recession drags on) ?
                • Do U.S. private and public institutions give the U.S. the best capacity to self-correct? (Used to be so, but is that still true) ?
                • Does the U.S. have the world's least corrupt government? (Yes, but it is catching up fast) ?
                • Does the U.S. offer the best opportunities for entrepreneurs to innovate and make money off the personal sacrifice that goes into building a new business (It did, but since 2001 began to treat entrepreneurs with contempt, putting them under crushing regulation and shipping its best trained engineers out of the country.) X
                Last edited by metalman; June 18, 2009, 01:54 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                  I don't disagree with your points Metalman... particularly as I'm in the process of starting an Outsourcing company that directly supports your last point. The USA is losing ground in the race of transparency and the support of entrepreneurship.

                  However, on a comparative basis, I still think we're a long way from being caught up with by most countries. Also, I think Obama's push for more transparency (whether real or unreal... just the talk) will help us reverse the ethics issues of the last 8 years. Now re the deficit vs stimulus, Obama's got a very tough row to hoe and may not end up going the right direction.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                    Elaine Supkis (an itulip fan) posted a link to the story early on June 9 on her site.

                    http://emsnews.wordpress.com/2009/06...nce-all-crash/

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                      Originally posted by metalman View Post
                      tried listening to npr lately?

                      the producers of these shows don't give a shit about accuracy anymore.

                      'get me a loudmouth nutjob that people tune into! get me viewers. f&ck the brand!'
                      Yep, NPR is just monetizing ignorance, much like P.T. Barnum in another venue. Brand be damned.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                        Is it possible Treasury lied? Is it possible that Treasury told some technical truth but left out some more revealing facts or otherwise deliberately mislead? Is it possible that Treasury's spokesmen and statistics publishers themselves are kept from knowing some essentials of such matters?

                        Be not too quick to proclaim that you have the truth, the only truth, and have had so from the beginning, that truth now verified for certainty, consigning the purveyors of alternative speculations to the role of demogogues serving their own selfish interests.

                        Perhaps we don't understand all we know about this case yet. Perhaps what we do know isn't necessarily so.
                        Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                          Originally posted by Master Shake View Post
                          All one has to do to realize this is to visit a 9-11 Truther website or engage in debate with a Truther (or a "Chemtrails" conspiracist). A public television station aired a Truther documentary this month. They raised a lot of money from the pinheads who believe that stuff.
                          I'll have you know I am not a pinhead. My hat size is Extra Large, actually.

                          A bit more seriously, there are many variants and speculations as to what happened on 9/11. Roughly speaking, there is the official version and about 57 varieties of "alternative truth." However, just because 50+ of those alternative varieties cause your BS meter to peg doesn't prove the official version is the correct one.

                          I'll try to resist getting any more specific here however. If I spelled out my theory that Hitler planned 9/11 :rolleyes:, I would be improperly diverting this thread.
                          Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                            Aplhaville ruminates on this question.

                            Anyone speak japanese?
                            saying that one of two Japanese men in Italy is Tuneo Yamauchi. He is brother-in-law of Mr. Toshirou Mutoo, former deputy Governor of Bank of Japan.
                            So the question now turns into, who were these two men, and who were they acting on behalf of, and why?
                            It's Economics vs Thermodynamics. Thermodynamics wins.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Rise of the Demagogues: The case of the $134.5 billion in U.S. bonds - Eric Janszen

                              Originally posted by ThePythonicCow View Post
                              Is it possible Treasury lied? Is it possible that Treasury told some technical truth but left out some more revealing facts or otherwise deliberately mislead? Is it possible that Treasury's spokesmen and statistics publishers themselves are kept from knowing some essentials of such matters?

                              Be not too quick to proclaim that you have the truth, the only truth, and have had so from the beginning, that truth now verified for certainty, consigning the purveyors of alternative speculations to the role of demogogues serving their own selfish interests.

                              Perhaps we don't understand all we know about this case yet. Perhaps what we do know isn't necessarily so.
                              treasury bonds of all kinds...

                              the treasury.

                              only.

                              ever.

                              printed.

                              $4 billion and change worth.

                              ever.

                              in total.

                              the rest are accounting entries.

                              where'd these 'japanese guys" (oooooh! that sounds suspicious! japanese guys!) get the other $130 billion worth? :confused:

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X