The National Weather Service just amended their weather forecast for January.
MUCH-BELOW NORMAL TEMPS on JAN 14th, 2011. The revision just came in and was posted Jan 11th.
Obviously, the long-term climate models were wrong. Not much consideration to dust in the upper-atmosphere from Iceland's eruption last summer?
Anyone care to look at the recent January temperatures in California? Look at the temps in recent days plunging to near 30-year lows.
Here for Victoria, Environment Canada is predicting 52F (11C) for late this week. Hello?????? That seems a bit warm for dust in the upper-atmosphere. Of course, the warmth would be due to air coming in from the tropical Pacific, but 52F in Victoria in January? I'm confused, as usual.
And then, the surface-sea temps in the La Nina are supposed to be cold. Then add the volcanic dust........ Show me.
I want the blossoms on the trees.
MUCH-BELOW NORMAL TEMPS on JAN 14th, 2011. The revision just came in and was posted Jan 11th.
Obviously, the long-term climate models were wrong. Not much consideration to dust in the upper-atmosphere from Iceland's eruption last summer?
Anyone care to look at the recent January temperatures in California? Look at the temps in recent days plunging to near 30-year lows.
Here for Victoria, Environment Canada is predicting 52F (11C) for late this week. Hello?????? That seems a bit warm for dust in the upper-atmosphere. Of course, the warmth would be due to air coming in from the tropical Pacific, but 52F in Victoria in January? I'm confused, as usual.
And then, the surface-sea temps in the La Nina are supposed to be cold. Then add the volcanic dust........ Show me.
I want the blossoms on the trees.
Comment